CFN Cloud
Cloud Future New Life
en zh
2025-10-02 · 0 views

Kubernetes Introduction

Understand the problems Kubernetes solves from a product view.

Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform. It answers the question of how to run services reliably and repeatedly, not how to write the business logic itself.

What it solves

  • Scheduling: place Pods on the right nodes
  • Self-healing: restart failed containers
  • Scaling: add or remove replicas by load
  • Service discovery: stable access to dynamic Pods

What it does not solve

  • Business performance bottlenecks
  • Database design
  • Code quality issues

Good fit for

  • Many services and frequent releases
  • Standardized rollout and rollback
  • Consistent operations and observability

One-line mental model

Kubernetes is a declarative system with controllers that automate operations.

Practical notes

  • Start with a quick inventory: kubectl get nodes, kubectl get pods -A, and kubectl get events -A.
  • Compare desired vs. observed state; kubectl describe usually explains drift or failed controllers.
  • Keep names, labels, and selectors consistent so Services and controllers can find Pods.

Quick checklist

  • The resource matches the intent you described in YAML.
  • Namespaces, RBAC, and images are correct for the target environment.
  • Health checks and logs are in place before promotion.

Reading the Kubernetes introduction as a system

the Kubernetes introduction makes more sense when you see Kubernetes as a set of contracts between people and controllers. You describe intent in YAML, controllers reconcile it, and the cluster keeps trying until reality matches the spec. That mental model is the same whether you are creating a Pod, a Service, or an entire environment. The key is to think in desired state, not imperative steps, and to accept that reconciliation is continuous.

Declarative workflow in practice

A typical workflow is write a manifest, apply it, observe status, then refine. The applied object becomes the source of truth, not the CLI command you typed. When you change a field, you are changing the desired state, and controllers take action to reach it. This encourages idempotent changes, repeatable rollouts, and safe automation because the same manifest can be applied in any environment without manual rework.

Object model and API habits

Every object follows the same shape: apiVersion, kind, metadata, and spec. The metadata block is not busywork. Names, labels, and annotations are how other objects discover and manage your resource. Establish naming conventions, label taxonomy, and ownership references early, because they become the glue for services, selectors, and monitoring queries. A clean object model is the difference between a cluster you can reason about and one that feels unpredictable.

How control loops change your thinking

Control loops keep running, even when you are not watching. That means retries are normal, and eventual consistency is a feature. When a node disappears, schedulers place replacement Pods. When configuration changes, controllers roll out updates. This is why Kubernetes wants you to specify intent rather than sequence, and why most operations are safe to repeat. Design your workflows around observation and rollback instead of manual fixes.

Minimal lab sequence

A small lab makes these ideas concrete. Start by creating a namespace, deploy a simple workload, expose it, and then observe. You can follow a sequence like create or apply, check status, describe for events, and watch logs. Repeat this loop for a few objects to build intuition about the event stream and the pace of reconciliation.

kubectl create namespace demo
kubectl apply -f app.yaml
kubectl get pods -n demo
kubectl describe pod -n demo
kubectl get events -n demo --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp

Common misreads and corrections

People new to Kubernetes often assume it is a PaaS or a VM scheduler. It is neither. It is an orchestration system that assumes your app can be restarted. A Pod is not a long lived machine, and a Service is not a process. Namespaces organize resources but are not a strong security boundary by themselves. Correcting these assumptions early makes later concepts much easier.

Operational hygiene

Even in a quickstart, develop habits that scale. Keep manifests in version control. Use labels that encode owner, team, or environment. Define resource requests and limits so scheduling is predictable. Enable logs and metrics from the start, not as an afterthought, because every troubleshooting session depends on them. When you treat the cluster as a system of record, the mental overhead drops.

Decision points and tradeoffs

Kubernetes gives you choices that matter in practice: deployment vs statefulset, rolling updates vs recreate, small replicas vs larger nodes. There is rarely a single correct answer, so it helps to document the tradeoffs you pick. The fastest path is not always the safest, and the most complex option is rarely needed early.

Control plane roles in one paragraph

The API server is the front door for all requests, and etcd is the durable store that holds desired and observed state. The scheduler assigns Pods to nodes, and controllers continuously drive state toward your intent. When you understand who does what, troubleshooting becomes far more systematic.

Versioning and compatibility

APIs evolve and some fields are deprecated over time. Prefer stable API versions, read release notes before upgrades, and avoid depending on alpha behavior in production. A small effort to track API changes saves you from surprise breakages later.

Boundaries of responsibility

Kubernetes does not build images, write CI pipelines, or secure your application logic. You still need a registry, vulnerability scanning, CI/CD, and app level monitoring. The platform handles orchestration, not product engineering.

A simple mental checklist

Before you apply changes, ask what the desired state is, which controller owns it, how you will detect failure, and how you will roll back. This checklist keeps the focus on intent, ownership, and observability. It also forces you to think about cleanup: which resources remain after delete, which data is durable, and which objects are safe to recreate.

When to revisit the Kubernetes introduction

After you ship a few workloads, come back to the Kubernetes introduction with real incidents in mind. The same concepts will look different once you have dealt with a failed rollout, a noisy neighbor, or a quota limit. That feedback loop is where quickstart knowledge turns into production skill.

Field checklist

When you move from a quick lab to real traffic, confirm the basics every time. Check resource requests, readiness behavior, log coverage, alerting, and clear rollback steps. A checklist prevents skipping the boring steps that keep services stable. Keep it short, repeatable, and stored with the repo so it evolves with the service and stays close to the code.

Troubleshooting flow

Start from symptoms, not guesses. Review recent events for scheduling, image, or probe failures, then scan logs for application errors. If traffic is failing, confirm readiness, verify endpoints, and trace the request path hop by hop. When data looks wrong, validate the active version and configuration against the release plan. Always record what you changed so a rollback is fast and a postmortem is accurate.

Small exercises to build confidence

Practice common operations in a safe environment. Scale the workload up and down and observe how quickly it stabilizes. Restart a single Pod and watch how the service routes around it. Change one configuration value and verify that the change is visible in logs or metrics. These small drills teach how the system behaves under real operations without waiting for an outage.

Production guardrails

Introduce limits gradually. Resource quotas, PodDisruptionBudgets, and network policies should be tested in staging before production. Keep backups and restore procedures documented, even for stateless services, because dependencies often are not stateless. Align monitoring with user outcomes so you catch regressions before they become incidents.

Documentation and ownership

Write down who owns the service, what success looks like, and which dashboards to use. Include the on-call rotation, escalation path, and basic runbooks for common failures. A small amount of documentation removes a lot of guesswork during incidents and helps new team members ramp up quickly.

Quick validation

After any change, validate the system the same way a user would. Hit the main endpoint, check latency, and watch for error spikes. Confirm that new pods are ready, old ones are gone, and metrics are stable. If the change touched storage, verify disk usage and cleanup behavior. If it touched networking, confirm DNS names and endpoint lists are correct.

Release notes

Write a short note with what changed, why it changed, and how to roll back. This is not bureaucracy; it prevents confusion during incidents. Even a few bullets help future you remember intent and context.

Capacity check

Compare current usage to requests and limits. If the service is close to limits, plan a small scaling adjustment before traffic grows. Capacity planning is easier when it is incremental rather than reactive.

Final reminder

Keep changes small and observable. If a release is risky, reduce scope and validate in staging first. Prefer frequent small updates over rare large ones. When in doubt, pick the option that simplifies rollback and reduces time to detect issues. The goal is not perfect config, but predictable operations.

References